operating systems

From: Hotze <photze_at_batelco.com.bh>
Date: Wed Dec 31 14:03:27 1997

>I'll have to reserve judgement on Win 3.1 as I've never tried to run it on
>an 8088 (I thought Microsoft dropped support for the mode required by the
>8088 in Win3.1, though), but OS/2 is right out. It's entire reason for
>being is to run on the 286, so an XT won't cut it.
I haven't personally tried it, but a Japanese company had some XT clone
laptops (OK, luggables) which ran Windows 3.x (Maybe it was 3.0, or 3.1,
there's not to awful much of a difference in my mind).
>In addition to Xenix, CP/M-86, Minix, and a variety of Forths, there are
>other Unix clones (Venix, for exmaple), the UCSD P-system, and MP/M-86 (if
you
>can find it!). I don't know offhand whether Concurrent CP/M-86 requires a
>286, but I do not believe it does.
Yes, but someone somehow (maybe they just upgraded the motherboard) used
OS/2 on their XT. (Well, it had an XT case)
    Want to see how much people can laugh without getting knocked out/dying?
Call IBM tech support on it.
    Tim D. Hotze
Received on Wed Dec 31 1997 - 14:03:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:25 BST