On Fri, 18 Jul 1997 10:09:19 -0500 (CDT) starling_at_umr.edu wrote:
>>Would this be for proffit or non-proffit purposes?
Well, if we have to pay real $ for the info, we should try to make a
reasonable return. I'm not really considering remanufacturing anything in any
quantities, but just in case we need to, we can.
>>I could see purchasing the rights to the C=64 and setting them free as
public domain. Perhaps raise the money to do it by selling "shares" of
ownership in the rights to C= enthusiasts. That way, emulators can use
original C= ROM code without copyright infringement, and "Build Your Own
Commie 64" kits could be a possibility. Since the rights would be
purchased by the computing community, they'd belong to the computing
community.<<
I don't necessarily have a problem with this. If this ever comes to pass (a
slim chance at best), we can make provisions for emulator licenses.
>>I don't see much of a point to owning the rights to such things in a
for-proffit mode. Except maybe just bragging rights...<<
Mmmmm. What's wrong with a little bragging?? <g>
>>"Hey, baby... I own the exclusive rights to manufacture the Commodore
Plus 4. Want to go back to my place for a drink?"<<
;-) Sounds like Austin Powers!
------------------------
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin Charter Member (6)
- MCPS Windows 95/Networking
Received on Sun Jul 20 1997 - 17:20:26 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:27 BST