At 07:07 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>Actually, the 102 has the same size screen as the 100. Perhaps you're
>>thinking of the 200? The 200 is a clamshell design (iirc) with 24x80
>>screen. The 102 was simply a lighter, cheaper-to-make version of the 100.
>
>Wha? Whoa! Mmmmmm, noper. The 200's screen had only twice the real estate
>of the M100 -- it has a 40x16 screen. Yes it was a flip-top which was nice
Whups! Sorry. Us po' kids from the big city couldn't never afford none o'
dem fancy machineries. 8^) Don't know that I've ever seen a 200 (let alone
a 600) in the flesh. One of these days...
>(Get this -- the two halves are kept together during transit by *magnets*)
Hmmm...doesn't sound like such a great idea, but i guess since it doesn't
have a floppy drive...
P.S., has there been any messages on the m100 list? I've not gotten any
since you signed me up. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn_at_ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California
http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Received on Wed Nov 12 1997 - 10:48:19 GMT