MicroVAX help

From: Anthony Clifton <wirehead_at_retrocomputing.com>
Date: Sat Sep 6 16:37:24 1997

> <> Despite their possible historical significance, I've never been able
> <> to justify keeping a Microvax I around. The 11/730 - which for most
> <
> <I suppose it'd be a relatively UN-power-sucking way to enjoy or learn
> <VAX assembly language.
>
> Microvax-I uses more power than a microvax-II. The lowest power VAXen of
> the lot may be the vs2000 or the 3100m38s as they are in the PC power use
> range and performance is good(maybe the best!) on a per watt basis.

UN-power-sucking compared to an 11/750 is what I meant.

Anthony Clifton - WireHead Prime
Received on Sat Sep 06 1997 - 16:37:24 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:37 BST