OT, but info needed: RAM uprade

From: Allison J Parent <allisonp_at_world.std.com>
Date: Sun Dec 27 21:15:07 1998

<What's better? The 386sx or 386dx. From looking at the suffixes, it

DX. the DX had the needed logic for supporting an external cache the SX did

<(had - it's now parts) Gateway 386DX/25, and Compaq 386SX/20 (SLT386s/20).
<The Compaq could run more things quicker than the Gateway. Or is my case
<just a freak of nature or because of that majic stuff called Cache?

That was likely not cached. there are other parameters like memory wait
states and external bus speeds that can affect the total throughput of any

Received on Sun Dec 27 1998 - 21:15:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:50 BST