At 10:22 PM 2/12/98, you wrote:
> He is. Having the original version was a condition to him being allowed
>to buy the upgrade.
I suspect that that varies from vendor to vendor. Furthermore, unless it
is specifically stated on the info about getting the upgrade, I don't think
it would hold true, legally.
> That says it all. You must have the old version as a condition to have
>the upgrade.
Unless the license for the new version eliminates the license (or inherits,
if you prefer) for the old version. Which would make the old system disks
as invalid (unlicensed, whatever) as a backup of the old version.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger_at_sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California
http://www.sinasohn.com/
Received on Fri Feb 13 1998 - 19:59:35 GMT