Zenith Inteq

From: Marty <Marty_at_itgonline.com>
Date: Fri Feb 27 09:34:17 1998

 Doug,
 
 I used to repair tempested Zenith Inteq 248 machines in the late
 1980's. As mentioned earlier, the 16 bit boards were all isolated in
 the chassis and had cables run through a dead space to the external
 connectors. All boards have rfi suppression coils built in and of
 course there is a rfi suppression braid gasket running the entire
 circumference of the main system unit, if I recall there were about
 thirty-six to forty screws holding the cover on. The keyboard was
 tempested as well as the color monitor, both of these being very heavy
 in comparison to a untempested Z-248 system. I ran service calls out
 at the Vint Hill Farms Army base (near Warrenton, Virginia) to service
 these and always found it strange to have a tempested unit in a
 shielded building in a bank vault. Yes they used Syquest 10MB
 removeable disks. Also, whenever we had one of these units in our shop
 for repair (off base), prior to it being placed back in service,
 security would use an rfi sniffer prior to acceptance to ensure there
 was no leakage. I found a complete Zenith Inteq 248 with tempested
 color monitor and keyboard at a church sale a few years ago. I
 regretfully broke the rfi qa seal on the system unit and removed the
 cmos battery (AA lithium) as I was afraid it would leak and damage the
 system unit as I was tucking it away (until I find space to display
 it). When I broke the seal, I documented the date and reason why and
 placed this note inside the system unit so as to document its history.
 The system booted fine. Built like a tank.
 
 Marty Mintzell
 
 


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Zenith Inteq
Author: classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 2/26/98 11:08 PM


 Doug Yowza wrote:
 
> On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Mike Allison wrote:
>
> > My experience with these "TEMPEST" machines is that it's usually best to
> > swap out all the parts (great difficulty at times) and use the AT parts
> > in another box. The box is heavy and, as you stated, designed to
> > firewall the parts from the actual physical ports. There are good parts
> > on them however, disk drives, scsi connectors, video cards, mother
> > boards, memboards, that would work nice in another box and be easier
> > (read that cheaper) to mail.
 
 "TEMPEST" standards are there to afford proper sheilding to prevent
 radiations/emmisions fromt he machine when it's being used for security
 information. The thicker covers, ground braids and multiple screws in the
 covers make it better sealed and there should be no emmisions over 12 inches
 from the machine, or none at all ideally. Other than the power supply being a
 class A type, the rest is normal but may have been refitted with a shielded
 faceplate.
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  Russ Blakeman
  RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
      Phone: (502) 756-1749 / Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
      Email: rhblake_at_bbtel.com or rhblake_at_bigfoot.com
        Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
 
    * Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 ------ Message Header Follows ------
 Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
   (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
   id AA-1998Feb26.230809.1767.29101; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:08:09 -0500
 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
       by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
    id UAA29024; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 20:02:44 -0800
 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
       by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
    id UAA24610 for <classiccmp_at_lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998
 20:02:37 -0800
 Received: from bnllc2.blue.net (bnllc2.blue.net [206.65.217.254])
       by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
    id UAA07557 for <classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 20:02:36
 
 -0800
 Received: from bbtel.com (brand231.blue.net [206.65.221.231])
  by bnllc2.blue.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA05034
  for <classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:03:30 -0600 (CST)
 Message-Id: <34F63CAA.D1049E27_at_bbtel.com>
 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:10:18 -0600
 Reply-To: classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu
 Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner_at_u.washington.edu
 Precedence: bulk
 From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake_at_bbtel.com>
 To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
 <classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
 Subject: Re: Zenith Inteq
 References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980226214359.11741A-100000_at_behemoth.host4u.net>
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Received on Fri Feb 27 1998 - 09:34:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:54 BST