-----Original Message-----
From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn_at_ricochet.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, January 13, 1998 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Firsts
>At 09:45 PM 1/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>> No handles??? 'Tain't a Portable then!
>
>Whups, forgot the 8^)
>
>>Hmmm, maybe having handles isn't the best criteria for determining if a
>>machine is portable.
>
>Hmmm...
>
>Panasonic Sr. Partner: Handle
>Apple Mac Portable: Handle
>HP LS/12: Handle
>Altima 2: Handle
>Good Composer: Handel
>Amstrad PPC640: Handle
>Bondwell B310+: Handle
>Osborne 01: Handle
>
>(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
>
Commodore Sx-64 Handle
Kaypro I Handle
Kaypro II Handle
Kaypro16 Handle
IBM portable PC Handle
Compac Portable Handle
MAC toaster style Handle (yes on top of the unit)(Oops does that make it a
portable?)
(I couldn't resist either)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Francois Auradon.
Visit the SANCTUARY at
http://home.att.net/~francois.auradon
>>It seems that portable machines are those which the manufacturer built
>>to be easily picked up (in some cases without grunting too loudly) and
moved
>>to another location to be used. This holds for suitable values of
"easily".
>
>Yep.
>
>>Yes, Roger. I know you were kidding.
>
>Aw, shucks. I thought I had ya fooled. 8^)
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger_at_sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
>
Received on Tue Jan 13 1998 - 21:36:39 GMT