Development, round II

From: Hotze <photze_at_batelco.com.bh>
Date: Sat Jan 31 01:51:58 1998

I'm actually interested in getting a copy of Warp. Is it true taht there's
still another version coming out (I've heard rumors...)
    Thanks,

Tim D. Hotze
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Prymmer <pvhp_at_forte.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, January 31, 1998 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Development, round II


>classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu
>Subj: Re: Re[4]: Development, round II
>
>
>Barry Peterson wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Jan 1998 19:41:15 -0600, you said:
>>
>>>
>>>IIRC they started officially calling it Warp with V2.0, the first =
>>release following the Microsoft/IBM breakup.
>>
>>I have a copy of 2.0; it is not called Warp. That started with version
>>3.
>
>The story that I read somewhere was that "Warp" was used internally at IBM.
>With version 3.0 they were explicit about it and put that name on the box.
>
>Peter Prymmer
>
>,
Received on Sat Jan 31 1998 - 01:51:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:58 BST