eBay and online auctions

From: William Donzelli <william_at_ans.net>
Date: Sat Jan 31 19:57:35 1998

> 1) They're hardly original, which may bother some people

The reason for using FPGAs (or whatever) is good if you can not find a
donor machine.

> 2) You'll probably have to make up a kludge-board to get the power pins
> and clock inputs in the right places. Doing that for a chip with pins on
> a 0.5mm spacing will be interesting to say the least.

I did not say it would be _easy_. Anyway, many FPGAs are available in the
same styles of packages.

> 3) Remember you probably don't have complete timing specs of the chip
> you're trying to replace. You may not even have a functional spec. Trying
> to design a replacement will be interesting...

Incredibly hard today, perhaps easy in the future. Envision a logic
analysis program that one could clip on a working chip (from another
machine, obviously) that would think a while then spit out several hundred
pages of HDL describing what it saw.

> There's a chip in my HP Omnigo made by Vadem. It's a complete PC/XT apart
> from the memory (but including the CPU, DMA, interrupt controller, serial
> port, keyboard interface, parallel port, etc) together with an LCD
> controller. Trying to emulate _that_ in an FPGA would be an interesting
> task, even with the data sheet (which I have, all 230 pages of it).

In ten years, what will FPGA densities be like? Probably way beyond what
they are now. How about core sets that could be dropped into (or added to)
FPGAs? The Z80 still lives in this fashion, with gate arrays, and probably
will continue to for ten more years.

William Donzelli
william_at_ans.net
Received on Sat Jan 31 1998 - 19:57:35 GMT