>>> I counted with a stopwatch. It beat very fast, so it might be even
>>> higher than 120Hz, but it certainly is much higher than 60. I don't know
>>> if they'll actually let me do this repair anyway.
>> You counted 120 cycles per second with a _stopwatch_?
> Yes, I wondered about that. 120 per minute is understandable, but 120Hz?
> No way.
Shure - take a 60 (or 50) Hz clock feed the signal and
stop the time neded to show a minute (or 10 minutes to
get fractions) - or take any other steping device and
look at the stepping speed - This way you could even use
an old Apple DISK ][ as a counting device - put it on track
30, hook up the signal and wait until it reaches track zero
- you'll get an acustic feedback - now its just finger
calculations.
Servus
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Received on Mon Jul 06 1998 - 09:55:28 BST