Maybe a buck or two, you can't get much for them anymore, even though they
still have a very big purpose in computing. Check sometime and see how many
people are using their C= equipment on the net sometime and you'll see what
I mean.
John Higginbotham wrote:
> At 11:49 AM 7/6/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >The C64C utilized a reduced chip design, replaced the MOS6510 with
> >an MOS8510 and SID was changed but not for the better (could only do
> >3 voices instead of 4, don't remember if it was the white noise
> >channel that was dropped) and the VIC-II also received a new
> >chip revision.
>
> Ack. I hope those dealers I mentioned before aren't marking up the price
> just because the c64c looks more like a c128...
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake_at_bbtel.com or rhblake_at_bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Jul 06 1998 - 20:33:04 BST