> At 07:04 PM 11/2/98 +0000, Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> >Yes, but fortunately the starting date doesn't move forwards as well. In
> >other words, OK, some 386 PCs with custom chips in them are now classics
> >on this list (I have a problem with saying that, BTW...).
>
> I tend to agree with you. Discussion of ten-year-old IBM PC clones
> isn't as interesting. Dare I cause a schism by suggesting that
> the ten-year-rule be changed to "computers first made before 19xx?"
> I'll leave the date open to debate. :-)
>
> - John
Personally I don't have a problem if people want to discuss early PCs here.
I agree there are better forums for a lot of it, but as older styles of PCs,
say, VLB and EISA become more and more obselete, those other forums will
gradually know less and less about them, and they become more and more our
bailiwick. Personally I too find the discussions about old DEC mini's and
apple 2's to be of the most interest because I know something about those
machines, but I'm not willing to say we shouldn't discuss early PCs or Macs.
--
Jim Strickland
jim_at_DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Nov 02 1998 - 17:03:10 GMT