Recent Finds & Thoughts

From: Stephen Dauphin <ai705_at_osfn.org>
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:05:39 1998

On Thu, 26 Nov 1998 Philip.Belben_at_pgen.com wrote:
>
> I agree with whoever pointed out that you can use the two tracks of the
> stereo audio for different programs. Cross talk is negligible. That's 140
> min. After all, those of us with reel-to-reel tape have been doing this
> for years...
>

And this brings up why debate methodology? Aren't burnable CDs at the 1
or 2 cent per minute cost level? Seems to me, I would vote for overkill
in the recording process.

Even if hundreds of cassettes are involved, aren't most of these tapes
relatively short? I think most of mine are.

Might also be a good idea to use the standard audio sampling frequency.
There may be a variety of goals here, but I think the ultimate one is to
make an identical cassette, from a master signal, to use with a real
computer and proper tape drive.




                                            -- Stephen Dauphin
Received on Thu Nov 26 1998 - 11:05:39 GMT