NeXT [was Re: Radio Shack Model ][ available (Portland Oregon)]

From: Thomas Pfaff <thomas100_at_home.com>
Date: Sun Sep 13 17:11:30 1998

Hi,

You didn't miss that much.

Windows NT was essentially patterned after NeXTStep, though it still
has a way to go in order to catch up. Assuming you believe that
dynamic binding is an inevitable innovation and DLLs are the
brain-dead broken mess they are, NT still has a long way to go to
catch up to where NeXTStep was. There are other issues as well that
push NT back to the cro-magon era, but dynamic binding is the issue
that always sticks in my head since it yields overall improvements in
application performance and reliability at the same time.

Thomas


----
_someone said:_
I missed alot of this thread, but could you please explain how the
Nextstep operating system is related to NT?
--
============================================================---------
Dominique Cormann                          Email:kozmik_at_wave.home.com
     Posted with Becky 1.24 --> http://www.rimarts.co.jp/becky.htm
Received on Sun Sep 13 1998 - 17:11:30 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:33 BST