GUIs 'forced' on people (was Re: Here's something to consider.)

From: Ward Donald Griffiths III <gram_at_cnct.com>
Date: Wed Sep 16 20:10:41 1998

Eric Smith wrote:

> The original posting claimed that if Apple hadn't been successful, we
> wouldn't be running GUIs. This is absurd; Microsoft was aware of the Xerox
> work before Apple developed the Lisa, and had in fact hired some ex-Xerox
> people. Windows might have been released later, but it still would have
> happened. And if Microsoft hadn't done it, someone else would have.

I did not say there wouldn't be GUIs. But without the competition
between the Mac OS and Microsoft, I seriously doubt there would have
been anything close to the marketing pressure brought to bear. Hell,
I'm using a GUI even as I type, XFree86, so I can have several xterms
visible simultaneously while I'm using Netscrape. I'd estimate that
GUIs would have maybe 30% of the market penetration they have now
without that competition. And yes, there's a plus -- the demands of
Windows has spurred vastly the development of video and multimedia
hardware, as well as pushing for faster CPUs. So I can recompile my
Linux kernel in a small fraction of the time it would have taken
otherwise. The black cloud of Windows has produced a silver lining.
-- 
Ward Griffiths <mailto:gram_at_cnct.com> <http://www.cnct.com/home/gram/>
When I was crossing the border into Canada, they asked me if I had any
firearms with me.  I said "Well, what do you need?"  --  Steven Wright
Received on Wed Sep 16 1998 - 20:10:41 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:34 BST