On 17 Sep 1998 00:26:03 -0000
Eric Smith <eric_at_brouhaha.com> wrote:
> Although there can be no "proof" either way, I at least cited a possible
> (and widely believed) non-marketing reason for the success of VHS over Beta.
> You neither refuted my example, nor did you provide support for your claim
> that marketing is the primary cause in your two examples.
>
> I could just as easily claim that Mac vs. Windows and PowerPC vs. Pentium
> were decided by consumers solely on the basis of cost. I could probably
> come up with half a dozen other expanations that have nothing to do with
> marketing. I don't need to invoke any mystical, unsupported "marketing"
> claim.
>
I agree with you. I think people are greatly oversimplifying things when
they generalize everything that happens in a marketplace that is
dominated by someone, as a win that was due to better marketing.
Marketing is a factor, but isn't the only one.
--
============================================================---------
Dominique Cormann Email:kozmik_at_wave.home.com
Posted with Becky 1.24 --> http://www.rimarts.co.jp/becky.htm
Received on Thu Sep 17 1998 - 01:14:29 BST