Doug Yowza wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Russ Blakeman wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look to see what processor you're running then? I've never
> > thought to try it on an XT with a bunch of EMS/XMS memory. Thanks for
> > creating yet another tinkering project that I'll be dying to get at.
>
> You'll be sorry. There is a reason they dropped real-mode support, you
> know. In any case, it will try to detect the CPU and use the run-time for
> that CPU, but there is a way to force it to run as if it were on a
> lower-class CPU.
>
> I'm not positive, and I don't have an easy way to check, but I think it
> is:
> win/s -- standard (i.e., 286) mode
> win/r -- real mode
It's only experimental to see what it does anyway, so if it runs like crap I
don't care. Just never thought it would run on a PC/XT platform. You're right
on the switches though, and /3 is enhanced mode on 386's and up.
___________________________________________________
Russ Blakeman, aka "Pooter Fixer"
Email: rhblake_at_bbtel.com or rhblake_at_bigfoot.com
Website:
http://members.xoom.com/pooterfixer/
___________________________________________________
Received on Sun Sep 20 1998 - 18:17:13 BST