(no subject)

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Tue Aug 3 20:53:26 1999

Yes, I can tell you how they're related . . . it's a temporal relation,
though, not a contextual one. ('nuff said?) I hit the send button at the
wrong time, having inserted a piece of text in the wrong place. (I think
!??).

I thought better of remarking that though a number of folks, myself
included, didn't particuarly like the TI 99/4, that didn't make it worthless
as somebody had implied.

Unfortunately, I must have overflowed the stack (mine, not the computer's)
and put that other paragraph in the wrong place.

Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard_at_p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: (no subject)


>>
>> Since I have their latest CD, I have all the data sheets. What I'm after
is
>> the information about the logic cell resources, clock drivers, routing
>> resources, etc, generic to each family and not specific to a given
device.
>> The individual sheets seldom have that data.
>
>The message you're replying to seems to be talking about the TI99/4A home
>computer. The above paragraph seems to be talking about some kind of FPGA
>or PLD devices. Perhapes somebody can enlighten me as to how they're
>related..
>
>-tony
>
Received on Tue Aug 03 1999 - 20:53:26 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:48 BST