PDP era and a question

From: CLASSICCMP_at_trailing-edge.com <(CLASSICCMP_at_trailing-edge.com)>
Date: Thu Aug 26 18:47:42 1999

>Making a processor is not hard (although FPGAs might make it harder than
>just using simple TTL chips -- some of the manufacturer's claims on this
>are plain false). I'd not try to re-implement the PDP11 unless you had a
>good reason to do that -- rather, design an instruction set and
>architecture and implement it.

I agree 100% here. *Especially* if your goal is to run NetBSD or Linux
or (insert popular Unix-like free OS here). These OS's simply don't
fit well into the 16-bit virtual address space of an -11 (2.11 BSD
has many of the features of modern Unices, but doesn't have the wastage
found in NetBSD or Linux).

A small, RISC-ish instruction set is perfect for implementing NetBSD
on. Things get a bit more complicated as you add the necessary memory
management, of course!

-- 
 Tim Shoppa                        Email: shoppa_at_trailing-edge.com
 Trailing Edge Technology          WWW:   http://www.trailing-edge.com/
 7328 Bradley Blvd		   Voice: 301-767-5917
 Bethesda, MD, USA 20817           Fax:   301-767-5927
Received on Thu Aug 26 1999 - 18:47:42 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:51 BST