Umm, I guess you didn't read Ramsey's web pages.
http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/scstore/sitepages/hobby/fedpage2.htm
-Dave McGuire
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>Does anybody really believe this unsubstantiated and uncorroborated sort of
>prattle? The key difference between this and normal "news" is that real
>stories don't have to mask the names of the participants.
>
>While it's possible, stupid as our government is, it's not likely that a
>legitimate source of legitimate news would report a legitimate story in this
>way, with oblique references to what should be in the lead, and masked
>references to individuals and businesses likely to sue.
>
>Dick
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe <rigdonj_at_intellistar.net>
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
><classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
>Date: Monday, December 27, 1999 5:15 PM
>Subject: OT: Re: OT?: Illegal Transmitters
>
>
>>At 02:09 PM 12/27/99 -0800, Marvin wrote:
>>>
>>>While the direct subject is off topic, if the Federal raids *were* at
>>>gunpoint and actually were *raids*, I could see this becoming a problem
>>>collecting some computers.
>>>
>>>http://www.2600.com/news/1999/1218.html
>>>
>>>For those of you who are html impaired, the subject concerns raids carried
>>>out on a number of small businesses making electronic kits including
>Ramsey
>>>Electronics and Super Circuits. The subject in question appears to be
>>>equipment that could be used for wiretapping.
>>
>> So what else is new? Gun owners have had to put with this kind of
>>harrasment and rediculous interpetation of the laws for years.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>>
>>
Received on Mon Dec 27 1999 - 18:41:46 GMT