Abject apology for spam response

From: Derek Peschel <dpeschel_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Sun Feb 7 16:48:10 1999

> Sorry about that. Wasn't paying much attention and rather assumed
> that the advertiser had set the response address to itself. Glad I
> also neglected to attach the images. (If you want to see them,
> they're on my home page and no, I didn't create them).

Not only that -- The original spam was incorrectly set up (i.e., the
addresses weren't set up in the way you expected), but your reply was
correctly set up (i.e., your return address was apparently not legal).

Obviously, that's good because the spammer then couldn't send you more spam.
But it's also bad because the snotty message I tried to send you bounced.
How neat and tidy. :)

-- Derek
Received on Sun Feb 07 1999 - 16:48:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:59 BST