On 10 Feb 1999, Eric Smith wrote:
> Sam wrote:
> > The 4040 was actually very different from the 4004. The 8008 is closer in
> > architecture to the 4004 than the 4040. The 4040 was actually a very
> > different design from the 4004.
>
> Not really. The 4040 was just an improved 4004 with more registers, a
> few more instructions, and a few more select lines (so that it could
> address more memory).
I'm getting this opinion straight from Ted Hoff himself. I don't know
where my notes are on this and I can't remember the details, but I think
there are some significant differences between the 4040 and 4004. The
8008 was supposed to have been based on the 4004 architecture, extending
it with more instructions and such. The 4040 was, I think, a whole
different design by a different team inside Intel.
I'll have to find my notes I guess.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always hasslin' the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See
http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
Received on Wed Feb 10 1999 - 11:27:58 GMT