On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Megan wrote:
> Following up to my own post...
> I think the problem with '1.44 Mb' is that IBM chose to refer to
> the exact number of bytes without using the power-of-two term
> properly.
If so, how does 1474560 become 1.44M, not 1.47M?
The only way is to mix the terms, and use 1024000 as a meg! That is
NEITHER the power of ten, NOR the power of two. In addition, it is NOT
what they then use to measure memory!
--
Fred Cisin cisin_at_xenosoft.com
XenoSoft http://www.xenosoft.com
2210 Sixth St. (510) 644-9366
Berkeley, CA 94710-2219
Received on Fri Jan 22 1999 - 12:08:06 GMT