Jim Strickland <jim_at_calico.litterbox.com> said:
> This tape wasn't new when I used it - it was a leftover vms patch tape from
> the 4.whatever world.  Now it was recorded at pretty low density - 1200bpi,
> if memory serves) but I would have expected it to have many more problems.
1200bpi would be a bit wierd.
Actually, the standard 7 and 9 track tape densities were something like:
Tape Density   Encoding method                               DEC Tape Drive
200BPI		(NRZ?) 
556BPI 		(NRZI?)					     TU10?
800BPI		NRZI (Non-Return to Zero Indescrete)         TU10/16/TE10/16
                                                             TU45/77/TS03?
                                                             TS04?
1600BPI		PE  (Phase Encoded)			     TE16/TU45/TU77/TU78
                                                             TA78 TS11
3200BPI
6250BPI		GCR (Group Coded Recording)		     TU78/TA78
I'm not sure if the TU10 went to 200BPI or 556BPI... Those were old old
densities from early IBM stuff.  I am also unsure of the TS03/04's.
There were other machines like the Cipher 880's that did 3200BPI
and 1600.  DEC used one as the TSV05.
Bill
Received on Wed Jan 27 1999 - 16:16:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:09 BST