State of the Hobby

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Thu Jul 1 19:45:58 1999

Don't expect sympathy from any evolutionists . . . the inability to continue
in life or in any other pursuit is simply a response to the need for certain
characteristics. In this case, income. If your income fails to keep up
with the cost of your hobby, you have little choice but to get another hobby
. . . or perhaps a job which pays better so you can forestall the same
extinction event a bit.

It's not fair to expect the universe to look out for you personally. It's
not the way of things that YOU or I, for that matter, get to set the price
of commodities on the market, else I'd set the price of gold really low when
I planned on buying and really high when I planned on selling. It won't be
long before you, like others on this list expect not only to get things for
no cost, but you'll soon want to be paid for taking them.

Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: William Donzelli <aw288_at_osfn.org>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, July 01, 1999 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: State of the Hobby


>> But you've missed the one 'fundamental' that uniquely gives our hobby
>> its true appeal: Our hobby exists (existed) purely for its own sake.
>> No strings, wire, or unneeded baggage. It existed purely for the joy
>> of computing at its most base level, and the aquisition of knowledge
>> of the science.
>
>I would not say that is a rule of thumb. I think there are many people on
>this list that pursue the hobby for the sake of the machines - almost as
>a sense of responsibility to preserve the past. I can say that nearly
>everyone at RCS shares this feeling, at least.
>
>> Hostile? Yer damned right. We're on the defensive now. The
>> 'marketplace'
>> is poised to fundamentally change what I perceive as the original charter
>> of the computing hobby.
>
>Well, as the old German man says - "Dat ist de vay de kookie krumbles".
>
>See below for the explanation...
>
>> This to me, clearly says you have no clue as to what is at stake here.
>> >From my perspective, it's more like lashing out at land speculators
>> who want to parcel out what was once tribal land, the parcels by the
>> lake commanding the highest prices. What was once an almost free and
>> accessable resource, now belongs only to the elite who can pay the price.
>
>[...]
>
>> Now there are amongst us speculators who don't truly believe;
>> they don't practice the true faith, and don't care to. All they
>> know is that computers have become a 'hot' collectible, and they want
>> a piece of the action. It is these that we must oppose.
>
>I think there are far more of these people than we think. How many of us
>actually _know_ someone that is doing this? Dealers tend to be rather
>open about what they do, simply because they want people to know what
>they have for sale. It is basically advertising.
>
>> I see the prices, and *I* just want to gag. The continued exposure
>> of our hobby on forums like E-BAy will only cause prices to rise. Very
>> soon, many of us will be priced out . . .
>
>None of the computers I have seen for sale, with the exception of a Bendix
>G-15, have been horribly outragous in an absolute sense. Look at just
>about ANY hobby that involves things collectable - the cream will cost
>four figures. Computers, depression glass, model trains, Hummels, books,
>clocks, whatever.
>
>Computers are interesting, however, because many of the people that are
>buying the things are in the computer industry, and are probably making
>good money. If I were a lowly technician* at UUnet, I would still be
>making enough to spend four figures _maybe_ once a year on something good
>like an Altair. If I were an engineer, something I am sure many of us are,
>a four figure Altair purchase would be something to stop and think about
>for a minute, but nothing that would drain the kid's college fund. Let's
>face it, both the money _and_the_collectors_ are in the computer industry.
>
>> SO you're convinced that someone with a pile of money to throw at
>> a 'hobby' simply wants it more than someone who's broke??!! Sheesh.
>> It must be nice to rich, so you feel justified in making implications
>> like that.
>
>This is (mostly) America, as they say. Work your butt off and get ahead
>of the game. Then buy your Altairs. So far, I know lots of people that
>make decent pay because of hard work, but I know no one that gets
>decent pay for whining. When I was a poor college student and wanted
>something, I would put extra hours in at the warehouse.
>
>> IN the hobby I knew, money was only a very small part of the equation.
>> Used to be, all I needed was a few dollars, some basic tools, and a
>> little luck. Now I need *deep* pockets, too. I'm upset that the
>> 'elite' is putting my favorite passtime out of my reach.
>
>Its not the "elite" that have something about cornering the computer
>collectable field - it happens to ALL collectable fields. I have seen it
>happen in two related instances.
>
>Back, maybe 15 years ago, I was in high school and was getting interested
>in old electronics - specifically collecting electron tubes and military
>radios. Back then, the electron tube market was just starting to go, but
>the military radio market was dead. I mean dead dead. Maybe Mr. Fandt can
>back me up on this, but back in 1985, one could get a Western Electric
>205D vacuum tube for about $25, and an Collins R-390A receiver for, well,
>free. If you paid more than $25 you were a sucker. Anyway, both markets
>started to mature and prices went up. These days a 205D will cost you
>about $350, and an R-390A will be about $500. Could anything stop these
>price increases? No. Absolutely nothing. People started to see how
>collectable these were, and in these two cases, both cream. Economics
>took over, with all of that supply and demand goobledygook we all slept
>thru in school.
>
>There were (and still are) speculators in these fields, but just not that
>many. There were (are) far more dealers, because most people like quick
>money, and speculation is not the place to make a quick dollar. The
>dealers, for the most part, are quite open about what they do. They demand
>good money because they know they can get it. The also demand good money
>because there are a great many dead ends that must be looked at before a
>big score. How many people like to search a dark, dirty, 110 degree F
>warehouse just to find nothing, all because of a good sounding lead?
>
>In the two above mentioned fields, there are "big guns" - those people
>that do have money. I know some of them, and have personally seen alot of
>collections. Most of these guys are very knowledgable, and treat their
>artifacts in a very loving manner. One of the perks of being a "big gun"
>and having a super collection is that people expect them to be
>authorities, and most end up being so. It works both ways - knowledge
>increases with new artifacts, and the quest to get more artifacts gets
>more intense as more questions arise from the knowledge. The idea that
>the "rich bastards" will just glass-case the items so onlookers can stare
is
>basically completely wrong - with tubes, radios, or computers. Most like
>to "show off" more than just what they purchased.
>
>In any case, the computer collecting field is going thru these changes,
>and nothing will stop it. Basically, deal with it in whatever way makes
>you happy, but certainly whining will do nothing but alienate.
>
>> True believers will always welcome initiates. But only the truly
>> committed will mature and contribute. These are the ones who will
>> make our hobby live. If you shut these out by raising the price
>> of admission, then our hobby (as we now know it) will certainly die.
>
>Initiation? Sounds idealist to me. When do we get a temple? And do we get
>to spank people with brightly colored paddles with latin mottos?
>
>*no, I was not a technician, I was an engineer, but I knew technicians.
>
>William Donzelli
>aw288_at_osfn.org
>
Received on Thu Jul 01 1999 - 19:45:58 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:10 BST