On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 allisonp_at_world.std.com wrote:
> > c) using an ordinary camera and scanning the prints.
> > Pro: - Cheapest solution (imidiate or in mid range if
> > a scanner has to be purchased)
> > - Resolution at least as good as with an customer range
> > digital camera
> > Con: - No short turn around cycle - you'll have to wait
> > for the prints and scan them
> > - most work (you'll have to scan them)
>
> E) do as in D but use a polaroid camara for the prints.
If you don't mind the horrible quality you get with an instant camera. I
have a pretty decent instant from Polaroid (I forget the model) and even
it doesn't output very good pictures, especially not what I would settle
for on a website.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See
http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
Received on Wed Jul 14 1999 - 21:09:44 BST