[OT] NT, software reliability, and the lack thereof.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Mike Ford <mikeford_at_netwiz.net>
Date: Tue Mar 16 12:16:04 1999

>At 07:45 PM 3/15/99 -0800, Sellam Ismail wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, Micros~1 assures us that they have a stable server operating
>> ^^^^^^^^
>>
>>Didn't anyone else realize how clever that was? :)
>
>Well, actually it should be "MICROS~1".
>
>- John

I don't get it, explain slowly please.
Received on Tue Mar 16 1999 - 12:16:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mike Ford: "Medieval methods... (was Re: Got a question....PDP? VAX?)"
Previous message: Cameron Kaiser: "Tiny Basic again"
In reply to: John Foust: "[OT] NT, software reliability, and the lack thereof."
Next in thread: Cameron Kaiser: "[OT] NT, software reliability, and the lack thereof."
Reply: Cameron Kaiser: "[OT] NT, software reliability, and the lack thereof."
Reply: Max Eskin: "[OT] NT, software reliability, and the lack thereof."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:20 BST