Kits vs ready-made (was RE: Rebirth of IMSAI)

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Wed Mar 31 20:18:22 1999

Your commment below about production is true enough, but such arrangements
built sloppily will suffer from day-to-day use in an environment where cards
are being move about. I'd say one should glue the part down and keep the
haywires as short as possible.

By the way, in the aerospace industry, 25 pieces is a long run. Almost
everything is built in small quantity because you're only building one or
two of those rockets or satellites, and by the time you do it again, the
design requirements have changed.

Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard_at_p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: Kits vs ready-made (was RE: Rebirth of IMSAI)


>>
>> The classic example is an IC suspended over a PCB by means of the little
>> pieces of #40 wire which connect it to the circuit. They're not always a
>
>Well I'd probably stick the IC down to something, and use thicker wire
>(stander wire-wrap wire is quite good for this), but I really don't see
>the problem with doing this for experimental/prototype circuits, even
>ones that are going to be used. I've done it many times and it's never
>given any trouble.
>
>> terrible way to do things, and they've even been blessed by the analog
>> weenies at NatSemi, but their use in modifying or even building circuits
>> intended for some practical use is an abomination. Experimentation,
well,
>> OK, but to use it repeatedly? . . .
>
>Well, obviously you don't want to use it in production (far too
>labour-intensive), but that should be the only problem if it's properly
done.
>
>-tony
>
Received on Wed Mar 31 1999 - 20:18:22 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:23 BST