New-fangled languages (was: BASIC

From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de>
Date: Thu May 13 14:32:58 1999

Date sent: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:34:04 -0700
Send reply to: classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis_at_mcmanis.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers" <classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: New-fangled languages (was: BASIC

> Line numbers were only "needed" when you didn't have an editor, they
> gave one the ability to replace lines in place by reusing their line
> numbers. It was quite elegant actually. If you edit your BASIC source
> code separately you only need targets for GOTO and GOSUB commands (which
> can be numbers or in cases like AmigaBASIC letters). I wrote a version
> of BASIC in Java that closely models BASIC-80 (aka Microsoft BASIC) and
> its available on my web site (and in a web browser window if you're
> patient.)
> --Chuck
> (http://www.professionals.com/~cmcmanis/)

NEAT!
(I'm just missing peek/pook to browse the internas :))
Gruss
H.

--
Stimm gegen SPAM:     http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
Vote against SPAM:    http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Received on Thu May 13 1999 - 14:32:58 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:24 BST