OT: how big would it be?

From: Alex Knight <aknight_at_mindspring.com>
Date: Wed Oct 20 21:27:43 1999

Hi,

I haven't been following this thread all that closely,
but the snippet below brought back some memories ...

Way back in '87 I visited the main Motorola facility in
Austin, TX. I was doing a lot of 68K-family based design
at that time for Nortel, and we were beginning to enter into a
strategic agreement with Motorola, so the folks there
were giving us a pretty in-depth tour of their facility.
I never will forget being taken into one of their
development labs, and over in a corner, on a shelf, were
two card cages. One was the prototype 68000 processor,
implemented on 11 wire-wrapped boards out of TTL logic
and similar-vintage components, all plugged into a
wire-wrapped backplane. Next to it was the prototype
68020 processor, which they were able to implement on 14
wire-wrapped boards. As I recall, these cards were a little
larger than what we were using in our systems at the time,
probably something like 12" x 12". I also recall them
telling me that the 68000 prototype ran the full instruction
set, and that it ran at a frequency of 500 KHz. I
hope that the folks at Motorola never threw that stuff out!

Regards,
Alex

Calculator History & Technology Museum Web Page
http://aknight.home.mindspring.com/calc.htm


At 10:15 PM 10/20/99 -0000, Eric Smith wrote:
>Allison wrote:
>> ok, By discrete you meand transistors and diodes.
>> An 8080 cpu would likely fill a rack 20-25" high with boards.
>
>IIRC, the 8080 was about 4000 MOSFET transistors. If you implemented it
>with individual FETs, and packed it densely, I think you could fit it in
>a 10.5" high rack space easily, and a 5.25" high rack space with difficulty.
>Of course, you'll need plenty of forced air cooling. From a serviceability
>point of view, building it less densely is clearly better.

...
Received on Wed Oct 20 1999 - 21:27:43 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:33 BST