Mike Cheponis wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> FACT: And it wasn't designed by some little ass-kisser fresh out of college; it
> was designed by Intel.
That's gonna come as a hell of a shock to the boys from Boca. Intel is responsible
for the processor, not the PC nor the architecture of the PC. There's a hell of
a difference.
> p.s. Is it common on this group for people to ignore the FACTS? Do FACTS
> matter, or is this a group where there are opinions and commonly-shared
> versions of reality, where facts are unimportant?
*ROFL* You're kidding, right? You can't distinguish between a PC and it's
processor and accuse others of ignoring facts??
Best,
Chris
--
Chris Kennedy
chris_at_mainecoon.com
http://www.mainecoon.com
PGP fingerprint: 4E99 10B6 7253 B048 6685 6CBC 55E1 20A3 108D AB97
Received on Mon Oct 25 1999 - 10:22:16 BST