Why is CP/M faster than DOS

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: allisonp_at_world.std.com <(allisonp_at_world.std.com)>
Date: Thu Sep 2 09:35:28 1999

> I'm sure CP/M eventually added those dynamic features, but DOS was
> much more I/O bound at boot time. You can get DOS in ROM, too.

Don't tell my Epson PX-8, CPM in rom. Theres not much to romming cpm.

Allison
Received on Thu Sep 02 1999 - 09:35:28 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Erlacher: "HP DraftMaster I"
Previous message: Joe: "HP plotters"
In reply to: John Foust: "Why is CP/M faster than DOS"
Next in thread: John Foust: "Why is CP/M faster than DOS"
Reply: John Foust: "Why is CP/M faster than DOS"
Reply: Marvin: "1st West Coast Computer Faire"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:35 BST