Mike Ford skrev:
>>Actually, I think CD-ROM deserves a nomination. It's an optical floppy
>>/without/ any protection from outside forces whatsoever. It's actually quite
>>horrible. It's also a read-only memory. Granted, there are burners trickling
>>down the market now, ten years after the introduction of the medium, but to
>>write anything to a CD, you have to go through an intricate mastering
>>process. At least cassettes usually had a simple user interface.
>Sniff, its always sad to hear about life in non mac places. With the Mac
>and even my OLD Sony I could drag and drop files just like with a floppy,
>except of course files like music tracks from other CDs are automatically
>accomodated. The burn command is explicit as it must be, but the rest is
>fairly transparent using Toast. Creating a production master of an audio CD
>from raw sound files is a bit more complicated, but just about anything
>else could have all the instructions on a single sheet of paper.
Compare it to a floppy. There is a jungle of abstraction layers compared to a
floppy.
>Robust 650 MB of storage on media cheap as floppies, I need more punishment
>like that.
Robust? They're rather unwieldly, too, not the kind you'd stuff into your
shirt pocket.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6.
"I'm all man underneath my skirt."
Boy George
Received on Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:57:46 GMT