The debate on what per say is a mini...

From: Neil Cherry <ncherry_at_home.net>
Date: Sat Dec 16 15:38:43 2000

Sellam Ismail wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Neil Cherry wrote:
>
> > Never let anyone convince you that the Mainframe is dead. Many of my
> > customers were about to retire a lot of big iron for NT machines when
> > they suddenly realized that the Mainframe could play server. They then
> > figured out it could do a lot more. So we have come full circle so to
> > speak.
>
> IBM has been pushing Linux on it's S/390 (I think that's the right one)
> where you can run thousands of virtual Linux servers on the one mainframe.
> In the article I read on it several months ago, someone was able to
> instantiate something like 44,000 virtual Linux boxes.

It's cool that they're playing with Linux but it's even better that it's
a mainframe. That is one powerful box, I wonder how they fixed the TCP/IP
problem? That problem was that the ethernet was directly connected to the
mainframe which killed the performance (that's was FEPs are for).

The most wonderful thing about a mainframe is that it can just about any
OS on it while running other OS's. And I think they're still some what
compatible with the old 1401, so they can run apps from over 40? years
ago.

BTW, I once watched a mainframe person do pipes and what not on a
mainframe session (3090) as easly as I can under Unix. So I get the
impression there is a lot more power there than I have any knowledge of.

-- 
Linux Home Automation           Neil Cherry             ncherry_at_home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry                         (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52           (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/				(SourceForge)
Received on Sat Dec 16 2000 - 15:38:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:50 BST