regarding the reply address on the list....

From: David Williams <dlw_at_trailingedge.com>
Date: Thu Feb 3 10:42:01 2000

I prefer the old way, this new way is playing havoc with the filter
functions on my mailer since the headers are never the same.
99% of the time I want to reply to the whole list and now it's more
work to do that.

On 3 Feb 00, at 7:59, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:

> My mailer doesn't "click"...
>
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, David C. Jenner wrote:
>
> > I vote for the new way. It's now trivial to
> > reply either to the sender alone, the sender
> > and the list, or the list alone.
> >
> > With a decent mailer each of these options is
> > now one click.
> >
> > Vastly superior.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > healyzh_at_aracnet.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not saying any of this to say how it should be set up. That's not my
> > > > call. I'm just saying what I've typically seen on other lists. If Derek
> > > > wants it changed to the old method, he can do it or he can call me to do it.
> > > >
> > > > I personally prefer the new way, but my vote doesn't count! :)
> > > >
> > > > Jay West
> > >
> > > I personally vote for the old way! I'm on quite a few different ML's and
> > > only the DECnet/Linux one does it this way. It's more of a pain to have to
> > > get the correct TO: with it set this way that the old way! Especially if
> > > I'm using 'elm', like right now, since I either have to forward it to the
> > > ML, or remember to chage the TO: after I'm done typing the message.
> > >
> > > Zane
> >
>



-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw_at_trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 10:42:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:52 BST