regarding the reply address on the list....

From: Rich Lafferty <rich_at_alcor.concordia.ca>
Date: Thu Feb 3 11:05:00 2000

On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 06:00:33PM +0000, Hans Franke (Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de) wrote:
>
> Last but not least, it's the RFC 822 way - and standards are the
> only real chance to go along.

I'm not sure what you mean, here. RFC 822 specifies that the Reply-To:
is to be set by the originator, but the rest of your post seems to
suggest that majordomo should change it. Could you clarify?

  -Rich

-- 
------------------------------ Rich Lafferty ---------------------------
 Sysadmin/Programmer, Instructional and Information Technology Services
   Concordia University, Montreal, QC                 (514) 848-7625
------------------------- rich_at_alcor.concordia.ca ----------------------
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 11:05:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:52 BST