regarding the reply address on the list....

From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de>
Date: Thu Feb 3 14:42:02 2000

(just realized that I did send this mail only to Eric
 - just I keep copies since the last failure ... not
 exactly a user friendly solution)

> "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin_at_xenosoft.com> wrote:
> > NOBODY had any serious difficulty using the old system.
> > SOME people have some difficulty with the new system.

> I disagree. I found the old system to be quite annoying. Every time I
> wanted to send a private reply, I had to grovel around in the headers to
> find the right address. As everyone has noticed, this often led to
> replys intended to be private winding up on the list.

> So I don't think it's accurate to say that "NOBODY had any..."

If you send more replys via PM than to the list you may be right.
I'd still go for a 'least possible effort' rule - and my majority
of replys goes direct to the list. Shure, I also did sometimes miss
to change the To part (and I still apology therefore) but thats way
more rare than the other way.

(oh and note the 'serious' part you left out)

Servus
Hans
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 14:42:02 GMT