Reply-to amd &%^$^ HTML crap

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Thu Feb 3 15:35:42 2000

On Feb 3, 8:10, John Lawson wrote:

> In all this discussion of the New Classiccmp regime... I would
> like to weigh in with Allison on the issue of HTML and Binary
> attachments propagated to this List.

[...]

> If this instance of majordomo has such filters, I, for one, would
> like to see them energized....

I was about to "second" Allison, but I'll "third" John instead since he
beat me to it :-)

I don't mind the bandwidth (though I might if HTML became more common),
it's just that it's a nuisance to read HTML (or anything with
"alternate-part"s) in another window, so I just skip over it with the
delete key. And my non-Microsoft mailers on no-M$ OSs don't handle some of
their more execrable alternatives anyway. As far as I'm concerned, email
is an ASCII (or perhaps ISO-8859-X) medium.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Dept. of Computer Science
						University of York
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 15:35:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:52 BST