[ClassicCMP] Does RSX-11M 4.0 support MSCP drives?

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Sun Feb 6 16:11:34 2000

Apologies if anyone already got this; I originally posted it during what
seems to have been an outage, and I assume the original is lost...

On Feb 5, 20:19, Chuck McManis wrote:
> At 12:31 AM 2/6/00 +0000, ete_at_dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull) wrote:
                            ^^^
ete? :-)

> >On Feb 5, 14:47, Chuck McManis wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if RSX-11M 4.0 supports MSCP drives?
> >
> >4.x certainly does, but I can't remember exactly which interfaces.
> >The earliest MSCP support appeared in 3.x, I think.

Nope, Pete was wrong again. It looks like MSCP support first appeared in
4.0. And I never did get my RQDX3 to work under RSX-11 (but I never had a
version later than 4.2).

> Well it may be moot if the tape is destroyed, however the plan was to
> install it on an 11/23 using a Sigma RQDE11 (Webster licensed) board. I
can
> tell it to report back to RSX any set of disks I would like. The trick is
> whether or not RSX will do the MSCP thing. (RT-11 won't for example until
> 5.1 :-()

I've never done an install from tape, except to recover a backup, and then
what matters is what standalone BRU or DSC supports. In 4.2 at least, BRU
and BRU64K.SYS (the standalone) do support MSCP, but the manual only lists
RA80/RA60/RA81/RC25/RD51/RX50 disks (and no MSCP tapes at all). DSC only
supports the RA80; standalone DSC has no MSCP support at all in 4.2. I'd
expect 4.0 supports even less.

The list above implies RQDX1 support and other things, but not RQDX3. That
might be a problem, because I think there's a bug in the early DU: handler
that prevents it working with RQDX3s. I certainly never got RSX-11 4.2 to
work with any RQDX3, and the same bug might apply to a 3rd-party
controller.

Best way to find out is to try it. I reckon there's a reasonable chance
it will work, especially if your disk controller works with RT-11 5.1.

In RT-11, full MSCP support post-dates even 5.1. 5.1 works with RQDX1/2,
but not RQDX3, for example; because whoever wrote the DU: handler ignored
the MSCP documentation and made an unwarranted assumption about the
contents of the SA register during initialisation. It took me ages to
trace the problem and fix it :-).

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Dept. of Computer Science
						University of York
Received on Sun Feb 06 2000 - 16:11:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:52 BST