[OT] Re: DSL Coming -- I may need help! : My ranting :)

From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin_at_bluefeathertech.com>
Date: Tue Feb 29 00:09:48 2000

At 20:13 28-02-2000 -0600, you wrote:

        <big snip>

>Not to mention that DSL traffic is carried as UBR (unspecified bit rate) on
>the ATM cell relay network. This means no QOS, no commited cells, no
>standard ATM service classes of any kind! UBR basically means "We might get
>your packets there if we have absolutely nothing else to do. Then again, we
>might not".

        So what am I supposed to do? I want control of my own servers, and I can
neither afford nor justify a frame relay private circuit.

        Also, I have to wonder about something. If everything you say is true, you
are implying also that DSL service stinks. If that's truly the case, why
has it become such a runaway success?

        I think I'll wait to see how it actually performs before I slap it down.
I'm not committed to any type of minimum service contract, so I really
don't have a lot to lose.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin_at_bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Received on Tue Feb 29 2000 - 00:09:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:54 BST