ASCII e-mail vs iso-8859-1
> ::> I agree 100%. Though I must point out that it has nothing at all to
> ::> do with "older" or "newer" systems...it's primarily a "windows" or
> ::> "non-windows" issue.
> ::
> ::Hmmm, so this is an operating systems vs. a pseudo operating system
> ::issue. Thanks for the explanation.
>
> iN THE SPIRIT OF THIS DISCUSSION, i SUBMIT THAT ALL MAIL SHOULD
> ACTUALLY BE IN petascii, AS BEFITS A CLASSIC COMPUTING FORUM.
> tHIS PARTICULAR MESSAGE SHOULD HOPEFULLY SET AN EXAMPLE.
>
I ^C^A^N^N^O^T ^U^N^D^E^R^S^T^A^N^D ^W^H^A^T ^Y^O^U ^A^R^E ^T^R^Y^I^N^G
^T^O ^S^A^Y. C^A^N ^Y^O^U ^R^E^S^E^N^D ^T^H^E ^M^E^S^S^A^G^E ^U^S^I^N^G
^P^R^O^P^E^R C^O^N^T^R^O^L D^A^T^A C^O^R^P^O^R^A^T^I^O^N (CDC) ASCII?
T^H^A^N^K ^Y^O^U.
L^A^W^R^E^N^C^E L^EM^A^Y
!RUTGERS!UMN-CS!LEMAY
Received on Sat Jun 10 2000 - 16:26:41 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:01 BST