ultrix disktab entry for an RF73?
Thanks for the information
I found another solution as well. The old DSNlink database gave me the
total number of sectors on the RF73 and identified a RZ73 disk with the
same characteristics. On an old alpha at work was a disktab entry for a
RZ73. I was able to munge the RZ73 information into a RF73 disktab.
I was only interested in the C partition so the others may or may not be
valid:
rf73|RF73|DEC RF73 Winchester:\
:ty=winchester:ns#71:nt#21:nc#2621:\
:pa#131072:ba#8192:fa#1024:\
:pb#262144:bb#4096:fb#1024:\
:pc#3907911:bc#8192:fc#1024:\
:pd#15884:bd#8192:fd#1024:\
:pe#307200:be#8192:fe#1024:\
:pf#542575:bf#8192:ff#1024:\
:pg#291346:bg#8192:fg#1024:
And here it is mounted on /scratch
Filesystem Total kbytes kbytes %
node kbytes used free used Mounted on
/dev/ra2a 15823 11632 2609 82% /
/dev/ra2g 445823 257260 143981 64% /usr
/dev/ra1c 368126 88626 242688 27% /usr/users
/dev/ra0c 1909325 232433 1485960 14% /scratch
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Clint Wolff (VAX collector) wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Most of the information in /etc/disktab is useless nowdays. The
> number of cylinders, heads, etc can safely be left out without
> any problems.
>
> What you do need is to decide on a partition table for the drive.
> I usually choose the largest drive listed, copy it to my new drive,
> and tweak the partitions covering the end of the drive to cover
> the additional cylinders of my new drive. IE partitions a,b are the
> same, c and h? are enlarged.
>
snip
>
> clint
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Paul Thompson wrote:
>
> > Greetings
> >
> > I have an elderly version of ultrix (4.2A) which knows nothing of disks of
> > mind boggling capacity such as the two gigabyte RF73.
snip
Received on Wed Nov 01 2000 - 22:03:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:11 BST