CP/M 1.3 memory requirement

From: Don Maslin <donm_at_cts.com>
Date: Fri Nov 3 01:00:08 2000

On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, ajp166 wrote:

> From: Joe <rigdonj_at_intellistar.net>
> > First of all, Win 3.1 runs on top of DOS. It's not a replacement
> >command processor. Second, ZCPR is mot a GUI and Windows is. BIG
> difference.
>
>
> Your being pandantic. Forgetit, the point is long lost.

Now Allison, he just proved the point that ZCPR does not increase the
bulk of CP/M, whereas Win3.1 does. Therefore, ZCPM is better!

                                                 - don

> >>be replaced with anything. For example CONIX is one that can be run
> over
> >>CCP for a unix like command line.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
>
> Actually conix is a bit weird but handy. runs nice on cp/m3 too.
>
>
> Allison
>
>
Received on Fri Nov 03 2000 - 01:00:08 GMT