USR has a habit of creating thier own protocols. They could screw up a
one-car funeral. Back in the BBS days I hated them passionatly.
Now that the real standards USR tried to undermine have become the
default, I have to say, thier modems are better than most cheapos in that
they are more flexible.
The USR Winmodem series (I call them Losemodems) are the worst pieces of
garbage ever foisted on the computer world. And I'm including the
Intellivision computer module in that appraisal.
Regards,
Jeff
In <768.359T700T1203829optimus_at_canit.se>, on 11/20/00
at 02:44 PM, "Iggy Drougge" <optimus_at_canit.se> said:
>Don Maslin skrev:
>>On 19 Nov 2000, Iggy Drougge wrote:
>>> Gene Buckle skrev:
>>>
>>> >> Someone always wants it all! Full duplex on a tin-can, yet. Sheesh!
>>> >>
>>> >What if we restrict him to a 1200/75 split channel? :)
>>>
>>> I was rather amused to see the return of split-speed (I never saw the first
>>> wave myself, but I'd read about it) when the 56k modems came, which have a
>>> 33k6 uplink.
>>Split-speed is not that long gone. After all, that was thebasis for US
>>Robotics HST protocol, was it not?
>Which HST protocol? AFAIK, there were at least two; one 9600 bps and one
>16800 bps flavour, as well IIRC a ~12900 flavour for mobile phones.
>--
>En ligne avec Thor 2.6.
>Was ist ein Erwachsener? Ein Kind, das vom Alter aufgepumpt ist. ---
>Simone de Beauvoir
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey S. Worley
President
Complete Computer Services, Inc.
30 Greenwood Rd.
Asheville, NC 28803
828-277-5959
Visit our website at HTTP://www.Real-Techs.com
THETechnoid_at_home.com
-----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Nov 20 2000 - 13:44:18 GMT