80186 and now AMY chip

From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de>
Date: Tue Nov 21 03:28:41 2000

> At 04:54 PM 11/10/00 +0000, John Honniball wrote:
> >Absolutely. It was just like an 8086, as far as the
> >programmer was concerned, but it had a few on-chip
> >peripherals.

> The threat of being asked to program the 80186 in assembler
> all day long played a major part in my decision to quit a
> job back in 1985 or so. I knew my brain would melt, so I
> became a freelance writer in the Amiga market.

Shure ? I had to go thru the same kind of decision, and I
learned to love the 186 - shure, one needs a little push
to start, but later on it's just great - eventualy the best
_sixteen_ bit CPU around. If you look at the 8080/5, Z80,
8086 and 80186 family, the 186 is the finest of all.

Sleak and simple - compared the 68K looks quite bloaded
and clumpsy (ok, it's 32 bit, but still the most compared
competition at it's time).

Gruss
H.

--
VCF Europa 2.0 am 28./29. April 2001 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
Received on Tue Nov 21 2000 - 03:28:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:13 BST