FOOBAR vs FUBAR

From: Neil Cherry <ncherry_at_home.net>
Date: Thu Oct 5 13:42:46 2000

Chuck McManis wrote:

> For anyone who has taught computer science the utility is clear, you need a
> non-specific name to indicate a specific instance of a something and FOO is
> as good as any, the three names used at USC were FOO, BAR, and BLETCH. Some
> added BLATHER if they needed a fourth. This is similar to the

Ah, that's what I was taught! I had previously learned the military version
from hanging around too many ex-military.

I use foo and bar on a daily basis, they are the names of files that I
can blow away on a whim and not worry about the contents. Knowing this I
never put anything that needs to be kept past the one reading/writing.

-- 
Linux Home Automation           Neil Cherry             ncherry_at_home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry                         (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52           (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/				(SourceForge)
Received on Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:42:46 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:15 BST