On Oct 23, 15:07, Hans Franke wrote:
> I may be coorected, but AFAIR are the 16032 and 32032 the very
> same CPUs - NS just changed at one point the family name 16xxx
> to 32xxx to reflect the 32 Bit hype. Bussize was always noted
> by the last two digits, while the middle digit served as family.
> 16008/32008 8-Bit external Data
> 16016/32016 16-Bit external Data
> 16032/32032 32-Bit external Data
Are you sure about that, Hans? When Acorn first talked about their NatSemi
second processor, they described it as a 16032; by the time it was
released, it was a 32016 and they claimed this was the same device
previously called a 16032.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Received on Mon Oct 23 2000 - 12:32:15 BST