healyzh skrev:
>> >You'll really need more RAM though, unless you find a version of OpenVMS
>> >older than V7.2. I've found that 112MB is the minimum for acceptable
>> >performance when running DECwindows, or 96MB without DECwindows installed.
>>
>> Aaargh! Is that really true? Then there is no chance of fitting it onto a
>> MicroVAX II!?
>Sure there is, the *VAX* version of OpenVMS will run quite nicely on a
>MicroVAX II. A bit slow, but it will run. I was talking about the *Alpha*
>version of OpenVMS. I thought that would be obvious.
No, I thought the only difference would be the processor architecture, just
like NetBSD ports. Mind you, a RISC processor might require some more RAM, but
over a hundred megs?
>BTW, read the OpenVMS SPD, you'll find a MicroVAX II with 16MB is about the
>minimum supported by OpenVMS V7.2. You'll probably want to leave DECwindows
>off the MicroVAX II unless you've actually got a video card and monitor for
>it.
There is a IIGPX at the usergroup, might be fun to put that screen to better
use than running an enormous NetBSD console.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
I can't understand ANY current MICROS~1 product names!
Are they now created with a random word generator?
What is the intent behind the name "Visual Studio" for their compiler suite?
What is "Interdev"?
Why is the Virus Transfer Protocol product named "Outlook"?
Grumpy Ol' Fred
Received on Thu Apr 05 2001 - 22:34:06 BST