Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: CLeyson_at_aol.com <
(CLeyson_at_aol.com)
>
Date
: Sat Dec 15 11:55:55 2001
Ben Franchuk wrote:
> "Should HTML/inline files be banded from EMAIL?" I ask.
> As of late I have turned inline viewing off, with all the
> stupid viruses around.
Thanks to AOL I can't turn this feature off :-(
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/attachments/20011215/789544de/attachment.html
Received on
Sat Dec 15 2001 - 11:55:55 GMT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Ben Franchuk: "Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")"
Previous message
:
Richard Erlacher: "Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")"
Next in thread
:
Ben Franchuk: "Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")"
Reply
:
Ben Franchuk: "Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")"
Reply
:
Eric J. Korpela: "Should engineers be licensed (Was "Geeks")"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:39 BST